A decision log for Microsoft Teams channels — not your meetings
Most "decisions for Teams" tools mean meeting minutes. SignalOps means your channels: it reads the written conversation in Teams and keeps every decision automatically, with a link back to the message — and joins it to the work in your tracker.
Also reads Slack, Discord, Linear, Jira, Asana and ClickUp.
Channels, not meeting minutes
The decisions that shape a week are made in Teams channels between meetings, in writing. Those are the ones that disappear. SignalOps reads them and keeps them — no recording, no bot in the call, no one asked to take minutes.
It works the same way across Slack and Discord, so a team split across tools gets one decision log, not three.
One evidence base, from two kinds of source
This is what makes SignalOps different. The AI you already pay for is stuck in one room: Slack AI only sees Slack, your tracker only sees tickets. SignalOps reads both your conversation and your work tracker, and — crucially — joins them. The decision argued out in a Slack thread and the Linear issue it concerns become one connected story, not two disconnected fragments.
Joined, not just collected
Deduplicated across sources
The same issue raised in a Slack thread and filed in Jira collapses into one signal — you see the problem once, with both sources attached, not twice.
Message linked to ticket
SignalOps knows that this conversation is about that Linear issue, and links them deterministically. The context and the work item travel together.
Correlated into groups
Related signals across channels and projects are correlated and grouped, so a problem that shows up in three places reads as one thing, not three.
Real delivery metrics
Connect a tracker and the delivery lens uses actual cycle-time — how long work really took — instead of a guess.
Four reports, and each one counts something different
Signals are the raw material. The value is what a whole period of them is read for. These four reports are not four summaries of one analysis — each one counts a different thing: the company, the counterparty, the work item, the threat. That is what makes them four documents instead of the same document with four titles, and each cites the exact signals it is built on.
Signals trend
openedresolved
Cycle-time
p50 · last 8 weeks
Backlog by type
open signals
Org Health
One short read on the company, ending in a verdict.
- What it answers
- What is the state of things, what is the single thing to do first — and what looks alarming but should be left alone?
- Why it matters
- It is the only report that tells you what NOT to spend attention on this period. A list of everything wrong is easy to produce and impossible to act on; naming the one thing that matters, and the things that do not, is the work.
Client & Stakeholder Health
Your outside relationships, grouped by the party rather than by the task.
- What it answers
- Which client relationships are at risk, and who is waiting on whom?
- Why it matters
- It labels every stalled item in one of two ways: they owe us, or we owe them. Those are opposite problems with opposite fixes, and a report that mixes them sends you to chase a client for something your own team has not finished.
Delivery Flow
Where work sits, how long it has been there, and who is holding it.
- What it answers
- Is our delivery actually working, and what is the one constraint to fix?
- Why it matters
- It names exactly ONE bottleneck and says why it and not the runner-up. Six bottlenecks is zero bottlenecks — the reader cannot choose, so they choose nothing. With a tracker connected this runs on real cycle time, not on a feeling about which project is slow.
Risk Register
What is open right now, plus what changed this period.
- What it answers
- What could still go wrong, who owns it, and what has nobody touched in weeks?
- Why it matters
- A register is a standing artifact, not a weekly recount — a risk opened months ago is still open today. It flags the two ways a register rots: entries with no owner, and entries nobody has looked at. Both are counted, not guessed at.
Go deeper
Written for the specific version of this problem you probably have.
- A decision log for Slack, without anyone keeping oneWhat was decided, by whom, in which thread — assembled from the conversation you already had.
- Pulling action items out of SlackWho agreed to what, by when, lifted from how people actually phrase it — not from a form nobody fills in.
- What Slack AI cannot seeWhy a summary of one channel is not the same as knowing what is going wrong across a quarter.
- Decided in chat, never filed in JiraThe gap between what the team agreed and what the tracker knows — measured, with the items named.
- Find project blockers your team already wrote downThe question nobody answered, the client you are waiting on, the ticket that stopped moving — found in the conversation and the tracker.
- A software delivery audit, without the interviewsWhere work waits, who owes whom and the one bottleneck to fix — read from what the team already wrote.
- Slack channel summaries — structured, not AI proseStructured, filterable channel summaries — decisions, risks and action items across Slack, Teams, Discord and your trackers, not a paragraph you lose.
- Spoke.ai alternative — AI for Slack and your trackersSpoke.ai was acquired and folded into Slack. SignalOps is the independent successor: AI for Slack, Teams and Discord plus your trackers, with typed signals.
- Slack analytics for private channels — content, not countsSlack's own analytics counts messages. SignalOps reads what is inside the private channels you invite it to — decisions, risks, action items — and never DMs.
Keep the decisions your Teams channels make
Connect Microsoft Teams and see last week's decisions, kept automatically.