A software delivery audit, from what your team already wrote
An outside audit takes weeks of interviews and leaves you a snapshot of what people remembered. SignalOps reads your team's chat and your tracker and produces the delivery part of an audit on a schedule: where work waits, who is holding it, which client is waiting on whom, and the one constraint to fix first. Every finding links back to the message or ticket it came from.
Free — no card, no sales call. Joins no calls, records nothing.
What an audit asks, and where the answers already are
A delivery audit asks a few plain questions: where does work get stuck, what is the team waiting on, which risks has nobody picked up, and what should be fixed first. The usual way to answer them is to interview people — who describe the work they remember, in the week they happen to be asked.
The same answers are already on record: in the thread where the decision was argued, the channel where a client went quiet, the ticket that has not moved in a month. SignalOps reads that record instead of asking about it.
Four reports, and each one counts something different
Signals are the raw material. The value is what a whole period of them is read for. These four reports are not four summaries of one analysis — each one counts a different thing: the company, the counterparty, the work item, the threat. That is what makes them four documents instead of the same document with four titles, and each cites the exact signals it is built on.
Signals trend
openedresolved
Cycle-time
p50 · last 8 weeks
Backlog by type
open signals
Org Health
One short read on the company, ending in a verdict.
- What it answers
- What is the state of things, what is the single thing to do first — and what looks alarming but should be left alone?
- Why it matters
- It is the only report that tells you what NOT to spend attention on this period. A list of everything wrong is easy to produce and impossible to act on; naming the one thing that matters, and the things that do not, is the work.
Client & Stakeholder Health
Your outside relationships, grouped by the party rather than by the task.
- What it answers
- Which client relationships are at risk, and who is waiting on whom?
- Why it matters
- It labels every stalled item in one of two ways: they owe us, or we owe them. Those are opposite problems with opposite fixes, and a report that mixes them sends you to chase a client for something your own team has not finished.
Delivery Flow
Where work sits, how long it has been there, and who is holding it.
- What it answers
- Is our delivery actually working, and what is the one constraint to fix?
- Why it matters
- It names exactly ONE bottleneck and says why it and not the runner-up. Six bottlenecks is zero bottlenecks — the reader cannot choose, so they choose nothing. With a tracker connected this runs on real cycle time, not on a feeling about which project is slow.
Risk Register
What is open right now, plus what changed this period.
- What it answers
- What could still go wrong, who owns it, and what has nobody touched in weeks?
- Why it matters
- A register is a standing artifact, not a weekly recount — a risk opened months ago is still open today. It flags the two ways a register rots: entries with no owner, and entries nobody has looked at. Both are counted, not guessed at.
Every recommendation shows its work
SignalOps does not just say "there's a problem." Each recommendation is structured and evidence-bound — it is refused if it cannot point at the real signals underneath it. That means you can trust it, and act on it, without re-reading the whole channel yourself.
Recurring: staging deploys fail on the migration step
P1Action plan
EngineeringRight-size the staging DB instance for the index build
OpsAdd a scheduled infra-parity check between staging and prod
Expected outcome: staging deploy failures drop to zero within two sprints.
- Problem
- What is wrong, in plain language.
- Evidence
- The exact signals and metrics it rests on — links back to the real messages, not a summary you have to take on faith.
- Impact area
- Delivery, quality, security, product, communication or operations — so you know whose problem it is.
- Priority
- P0 / P1 / P2, calibrated against how much evidence there actually is, not inflated to look urgent.
- Confidence
- Capped by how much data supported it. Sparse week, lower confidence — stated honestly, never dressed up.
- Action plan
- Concrete steps, each with a role (PM, Engineering, QA, Security, Ops, Leadership) and an effort estimate.
- Expected outcome
- What should change if you act — and how you would validate that it did.
What this audit does not cover
Code and architecture
It does not read your repository, review code or measure test coverage.
Security and licences
No vulnerability scan, no licence inventory, no compliance certificate. Those need a specialist.
Deployment statistics
It does not read git or your CI, so it reports nothing about deployment frequency or build times.
People
It never scores a person. It reports on work items, risks and relationships.
FAQ
What is a software delivery audit?
A review of how work moves from decision to done: where it waits, what it depends on, which risks are open and who owns them. A full engagement usually adds code, security and licences; SignalOps covers the delivery part, from your chat and your tracker.
Can it replace an external auditor?
For the delivery part it reads more than an interview can — what was written in the channels you connect, not the parts people remember. It does not audit code quality, security or compliance: a security concern someone raised in chat is kept as a risk, but nothing scans your systems or your code.
Do we have to prepare anything?
No. There is no tagging and no questionnaire. Connecting a workspace and choosing the channels and projects takes about two minutes; the analysis reads what was already written.
What does it cost?
It is free — no card and no sales call.
Go deeper
Written for the specific version of this problem you probably have.
- A decision log for Slack, without anyone keeping oneWhat was decided, by whom, in which thread — assembled from the conversation you already had.
- Pulling action items out of SlackWho agreed to what, by when, lifted from how people actually phrase it — not from a form nobody fills in.
- What Slack AI cannot seeWhy a summary of one channel is not the same as knowing what is going wrong across a quarter.
- Decided in chat, never filed in JiraThe gap between what the team agreed and what the tracker knows — measured, with the items named.
- Find project blockers your team already wrote downThe question nobody answered, the client you are waiting on, the ticket that stopped moving — found in the conversation and the tracker.
- Slack channel summaries — structured, not AI proseStructured, filterable channel summaries — decisions, risks and action items across Slack, Teams, Discord and your trackers, not a paragraph you lose.
- Spoke.ai alternative — AI for Slack and your trackersSpoke.ai was acquired and folded into Slack. SignalOps is the independent successor: AI for Slack, Teams and Discord plus your trackers, with typed signals.
- Decision log for Microsoft Teams channels, not meetingsSignalOps reads your Microsoft Teams channels and keeps a decision log automatically — from written conversation, not recordings — linked to your tracker.
- Slack analytics for private channels — content, not countsSlack's own analytics counts messages. SignalOps reads what is inside the private channels you invite it to — decisions, risks, action items — and never DMs.
Run a delivery audit on the last two weeks
Connect one workspace and read where delivery is stuck, what is at risk, and the one thing to fix first.